Monday, August 3, 2026
Titanomachina: Clymene Dinosaurus
Saturday, August 1, 2026
Titanomachina Tactics: Part 1
Friday, May 29, 2026
Titanomachina: Sheer Hubris
Last week my regular opponent made an error stepping into the danger zone, and paid for it with a round 2 ring-out. This week, it was my turn to seize defeat from the jaws of victory. This week was a full 9-round game, ending on a time-out, and finishing with a 14-13 in favour of Pugnacious Styxx (quaternary configuration) over Sagacious Rhea (primary configuration). Aside from a brief stab in the leg with a macro laser, and an incredible barrage of rockets on round 5, Styxx exercised a careful restraint on direct confrontation that lead to an eventual win on round 9. Perhaps it is worth noting that my opponent likes to conduct a tactical and strategic dialog (monolog?) on the voice chat, and I have confirmed that (a) my opponent likes to tell lies about strategy, and (b) is pretty good at mind games. Because of that chat I dropped the game when a crushing and impressive victory was in Rhea's grasp, thinking that I had sufficient reason not to pull it off, and plan B suffered from a laser to the knee. Afterwards my opponent graciously pointed out my error and perhaps a bit of vengeance was vowed.
Friday, May 22, 2026
Titanomachina: Danger Prone
Gracious Eurybia crushes Sagacious Rhea in a round 2 ring-out, 22-20VP. Notably Eurybia seizes the initiative, and moves west to engage Rhea as She retreats south behind buildings in tile 63 and clears a couple of habitats with Her vulcan gun. Eurybia uses initiate crew to operate Her gun battery to clear a couple of yellow habitats (21 & 31). Then Eurybia uses adherent crew to operate a coolant system, restoring the gun battery, initiate crew, and an arm to my hand. Without the yellow top of the building blocking line of sight, Eurybia and Rhea exchange fire, Rhea using a master-operated plasma howitzer, and Eurybia again firing the initiate-operated gun battery. I block the plasma shot to the gun battery that would have taken it off, destroying the extra armour I used to block it, removing a shield and doing heavy damage to the extra armour beneath it. Rhea is defenseless now though, and two shots to the front pushes Her off the battlefield.
Eurybia is down 7 habitats and caused a ring-out for +5VP. That's 22VPs. Rhea is down 5 habitats and destroyed an extra armour system for +1VP. That's 20VPs. Victory to Eurybia!
My worry is that something is too powerful, either the extra armour, or the coolant system. However, my opponent made a number of critical mistakes. One of those mistakes, I think, was using the vulcan gun to clear habitats. Yes, it put my opponent in the lead, but it meant that my opponent had zero cards in hand to respond to me doubling down on the gun battery. Furthermore my opponent did so in the danger-zone of the board, the outer ring of three tiles, that put them at risk of being pushed off the board.
To pull off this trick I needed six cards, the initiate crew and gun battery, the adherent crew and a charge card, and the coolant system to do what two gun batteries, two initiate crew, and a sponson would have also done. Had I used Tethys' tertiary configuration to pull this off it would have been five cards as well, as the digitigrade leg could have also turned the Titan to face Rhea. There's some argument that the plasma howitzer would have disabled the initiate crew operating one of the guns, but it could have easily been the one who had operated the gun that freed up the line of sight.
In a way I was also lucky that my opponent retreated into a quadrant of the board rich in yellow habitats all ready to be targets of opportunity for Eurybia's gun battery and buzz saw, because without those three habitats that Eurybia destroyed, the score would have been 19-20VP favouring Rhea even with the ring-out, so the game would have gone on with Rhea having Her edge in the initiative cemented by Eurybia's loss of frontal armour, albeit with Eurybia enjoying a 2-card advantage.
Now, just because my opponent could have rationed Rhea's strength more wisely does not mean there is not a problem. At the last Halcon, for example, a player managed to play two games without having ring-outs explained to them, and so when I went for a quick ring-out they were taken aback, and probably didn't have a great experience. While that was possibly a problem with one of the demonstrators not following the demo script, it shows that this lethality can feel bad for players.
Of the player types, the competitors, the explorers, achievers, and socializers, I am an explorer. I think all designers and developers are, even if we are exploring how the game might work for other types. I feel like my opponent is probably a competitor in the main, given their record against me and general strategic nous. As an intuitive player, I think they may have been taken by surprise by the combo.
But since I could have pulled off the move without the coolant system, and the double-layered extra armour systems would have yielded similar results to damaged crew, weapon, or sensor systems, I feel like this is an example of something similar to the Fool's Mate in Chess. I would propose calling it something like 'Danger Prone,' which is to say hanging around in the danger zone without any defenses loaded in your hand and getting shot off the board for your trouble. Certainly of late our games have involved a kind of relaxed and bluff attitude to ring-outs, and perhaps that is all.
Saturday, April 4, 2026
Titanomachina: Mirror-match Mayhem Encoded
Habitat Coordinates (xy - building randomizer colour)
- 13 - 3G 7P 8Y | 14 - 3G 4Y | 16 - 1Y 2P | 19 - 3G 7G 8G
- 22 - 3B 4G 7Y 8P | 28 - 3B 4Y 7Y 8B
- 31 - 3G 4B | 34 - 3B 4P 7Y 8B | 36 - 1P 2B 5B 6Y | 37 - 3G 4P 7P 8G
- 41 - 7B 8G | 43 - 3P 4G 7G 8Y | 47 - 1G 2P 5Y 6G | 49 - 5Y 6P
- 61 - 1Y 2P | 63 - 1B 2Y 5Y 6G | 67 - 3P 4Y 7G 8B | 69 - 3Y
- 73 - 3G 4Y 7P 8B | 74 - 1P 2B 5G 6P | 76 - 3Y 4G 7B 8P | 79 - 3G 7G 8Y
- 82 - 3B 4G 7Y 8P | 88 - 3B 4P 7Y 8G
- 91 - 3Y 7G | 94 - 5Y 6P | 96 - 7G 8B | 97 - 3P 4 B
Friday, April 3, 2026
Titanomachina: Mirror-match Mayhem
In this battle report I took Sagacious Eos vs Gracious Tethys, with the both of us choosing to arm our Titans with plasma shotguns, rocket pods, and laser blades. Of course, one significant difference was that Tethys had rear armour and two extra habitats while Eos packed another capacitor in Their frame. As my opponent would prophetically comment on the two habitat head-start: It's basically nothing. So when the game ended with a knock-out in round 8, seeing Eos crush in Tethys' sponson with a body-slam, damage Her capacitor and master crew with a swift stab from Their laser blade, and a final body-slam to destroy those systems, the final score was 21-19 for Eos. Had Eos executed in a different order, two body slams in a row, it would have been both a knock-out and a 19-18 victory for Eos. Notably there was a point in round 6 where Tethys might have blocked a kick to Her plasma shotgun with Her leg instead of Her prow, which would have seen Tethys suffer both a ring-out and a 19-18 victory.
There are, perhaps, two reasons for this somewhat bizarre situation where Eos has ripped Tethys open, but barely squeaked out a win. The first is that Tethys did a reasonably good job of increasing that initial two-habitat lead. The second is that Tethys was overwhelmed by Eos' higher rate of activity, with round 8's evisceration happening because Tethys ran out of gas while Eos had loaded both capacitors with 50% more power available. There is a third reason, I think, in that Tethys played defensively, and Eos really shines in situations where opponents are not hitting Them back effectively. But Eos managed to control the initiative fairly effectively by also maintaining not only a card advantage, but also tempo. The specific armament of plasma shotgun and laser blade, in combination with dual jump jets and capacitors is a real killer because a jump jet or weapon can be activated, its power recovered with a capacitor, and then another one fired. It's not easy to run away from that.
Monday, January 26, 2026
Two Legs Good, Four Legs Better
In which case a laser is the perfect weapon to shoot twice. The laser blade hits hard for that above-the-curve effect, while the laser battery might be more effective in volume where the first shot might soften shields and waste defensive action. A claw that can plow another Titan through a large building would also be on the menu. That or just keep the master crew running cool.
Wednesday, December 24, 2025
Titanomachina: Myrmidiae Formicide
I've been chewing on the results of the last Myrmidon ("Myrmidiae Formicide") games I've played and overall it's not great. The dice, the somewhat vague mapping of Titan end-games to Ant end-games, the shape of the game isn't satisfactory. It's not the kind of thing where fine-tuning some values is going to work. I think that a better place to restart development of the Myrmidon Mega-Ants would be back to the deterministic structure of Titanomachina, so no dice, variable charge costs based on a cards-to-cogs curve, and more actions available like full power, shields, etc.
Tactical units would be 0 charge, but two cogs, Support 1 charge for two cogs, Assault also 1 charge but for three cogs, and finally Command for 2 charge and three cogs. Attack ranges would be reduced to 1 for assault, 3 for tactical and command, and then 4 for support.
The platoon cards would be cogs equal to charge -1, in general, so Onslaught would be 2 charge but give three cogs and a potential six actions (three walks, three attacks). Firestorm would be 1 charge for two cogs for two Support units and four actions. The platoon cards would feature slightly improved ranges for attacks as well.
The command cards would vary from Advice at charge 0 for a one cog operate action to Swarm at charge 2 for a three cog reinforcement action. There would be a senior-crew style of operate action called Orders, with charge 1 for a two cog bonus to the next action. So with advice and orders three Tactical squads could walk one square and attack with one cog.
Shields up would be charge 0 for one cog's shield token to go on a unit. These shield tokens, much like in the Titan-based game, would be handy for off-setting the deterministic damage. Ditto the swarm card.
If you make a force of ten units, two Command, four Tactical, two Assault, and two Support, then it's a decision to decide what mix of platoon and support cards will put your force at 22 cards. That leaves 23 points out of the 65 VPs, including a full building complement. Suppose then all platoon cards (Onslaught, Firestorm, Charge, Redeploy) are three points each, for 12 points. That leaves 8 command cards with 11 points between them. Put Swarm at 3 points, Spotting and Orders at 2 points, and 1 point got Advice, Shields Up, Rally, and Regroup. That should give a good play-test force. Depending on what gets left out. I might keep Swarm and discard Redeploy?
Friday, December 5, 2025
Titanomachina: What is this? A war for Ants?!
Back in 2011, at the outset of the attempt to design what became Titanomachina, I wanted to be able to put Titans in the same game as conventional forces and elite forces. I feel like I've accomplished this game design goal, less through design than through the efforts of development. And after this latest game of Titanomachina playing a force of Myrmidon Mega-Ants against a mirror force, I feel like there's certainly room for development.
Firstly I should take the visual language developed for the Titan system cards and extend them to the ant squads cards, and especially the platoon cards, better. If you're not aware, the platoon cards are intended to enable players to act with several ant units at once, where the ant unit of five Myrmidons corresponds to a system on a Titan.
Currently those cards aren't really clear, given how they're supposed to take the cogs per action and apply it to up to three units portrayed on the cards. I was brainstorming a way to represent the bonus walk action of the Assault Ants, but I think I might just drop it entirely, as Assault Ants already have a great set of attacks. They can also be used for Spotting, Charge and Redeploy. This is only tangentially related to getting ripped apart by Assault Ant reinforcements in rounds 3-5.
There's also a good point about making the squads themselves more easily recognisable on the table. While I'm currently using Reversi chips, for their nice round shape, they also have some annoying behaviour making them finicky to use. Also, I can use Tabletop Simulator's token creation function to make some round tokens with symbols on them and lock the ant models to those.















.png)













